Causation
Causation means that one thing produces another — there is a real mechanism connecting them. It is distinct from correlation, which is merely a statistical pattern of two things moving together. Correlation is easy to observe; causation requires more than pattern-matching to establish.
graph TD Q[Two variables move together] Q --> COR[Correlation\nStatistical pattern only\nNo mechanism claimed] Q --> CAU[Causation\nA actually produces B\nMechanism exists] COR -->|"mistaking one for the other"| FC[False Cause Fallacy] CAU --> P["Probabilistic\n'A raises odds of B'"] CAU --> S["Sufficient\n'If A, then always B'"] CAU --> N["Necessary\n'Without A, B cannot happen'"]
How It Appears Per Course
PHIL 252
Core topic of Unit 7. The course frames causation as the central target of scientific reasoning, and Unit 7 is concerned with how causal claims can be made legitimately vs. fallaciously. The False Cause family of fallacies all involve mistaking correlation (or coincidence) for causation.
Correlation vs. Causation
Correlation: A and B move together statistically. When A goes up, B goes up (or down). This is measurable and observable but says nothing about why.
Causation: A actually brings about B. Changing A changes B because of a real mechanism.
The danger: correlation is easy to find in large datasets. Causation requires evidence of a mechanism, not just a pattern.
Three Types of Cause
Probabilistic Cause
A raises the chance of B, but doesn’t guarantee it. Most real-world causes are probabilistic.
Smoking increases the probability of lung cancer. Not every smoker gets cancer, but the risk is meaningfully elevated.
Keyword: increases the chance / raises the odds / more likely
Sufficient Cause
If A happens, B always happens. A is enough to guarantee B. But B can also happen without A — A is not the only path to B.
If Sam goes to the party, I go. His going is enough. But I might go for other reasons too.
Keyword: always / guaranteed / enough to produce
Necessary Cause
B cannot happen unless A happens. A is required. But A alone doesn’t guarantee B — it’s a prerequisite, not a guarantee.
Unless Sam goes, I’m not going. Sam is required. But Sam going doesn’t automatically bring me.
Keyword: unless / required / cannot happen without
Quick Reference
| Type | If A… | Without A… | Keyword |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probabilistic | B is more likely | B is less likely | raises odds / more likely |
| Sufficient | B always happens | B might still happen | always / enough |
| Necessary | B might happen | B cannot happen | unless / required |
Cross-Course Connections
FalseCause — the False Cause family all involve errors in causal reasoning
Analogy — scientific hypotheses about causation often begin as analogies
SelectionBiasVariants — a valid causal mechanism can still be undermined by a biased sample
InformalFallacies — False Cause is a category of informal fallacy
Key Points for Exam/Study
- Correlation ≠ causation — never assume causation from pattern alone
- Probabilistic: raises odds (most real causes); Sufficient: always works; Necessary: required
- Sufficient and Necessary are often confused — use the keyword test
- “Always” → Sufficient. “Unless / required” → Necessary. “Raises odds” → Probabilistic
- A cause can be both sufficient AND necessary, but usually they come apart
Open Questions
- Can probabilistic causation be proven, or only inferred statistically? What threshold of probability makes something count as a cause?
Cross-course: Causation-RiskManagement — how causal reasoning underpins the risk management process in ADMN 201 Cross-course: FalseCause-MotivationTheories — PHIL 252 false cause framework applied to motivation theory claims in ADMN 201